Updated on February 12, 2026.

On February 5, 2026, the parties in Center for Investigative Reporting v. U.S. Department of Labor jointly asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to lift the temporary stay that has halted disclosure of certain federal contractors’ EEO-1 Type 2 reports.  Accordingly, the legal case appears to be effectively over and disclosure is imminent. The parties’ request seeks to lift the stay as of February 9, 2026, so that the Department of Labor (“DOL”) can begin releases on a set timetable.

Contractors who submitted challenges to the disclosure of their EEO-1 data should be prepared that their data will be disclosed to the Center for Investigative Reporting as early as February 9, 2026.  Further, if past practice is any indication, the information will also be posted on the DOL’s website and available to the public.

Background

In July 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s order requiring disclosure of certain federal contractor EEO-1 Type 2 reports under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), concluding that the reports do not contain “commercial” information within the meaning of FOIA Exemption 4. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling followed a December 22, 2023 district court decision directing disclosure after rejecting Exemption 4 and Trade Secrets Act objections. As a result of the February 15, 2024 DOL appeal, the district court temporarily stayed the release of the Reports. Although the Ninth Circuit’s July 2025 ruling resolved a key legal question, the litigation continued in the district court over implementation and other outstanding issues.

Timeline for Disclosures and Remaining Issues

The parties’ February 5, 2026 stipulation asks the district court to lift the temporary stay effective February 9, 2026, and to authorize the DOL to roll out disclosures in phases. Under the contemplated schedule, DOL would first release bellwether objectors’ EEO-1 data and provide notice to non-bellwether contractors on February 11, 2026, with publication of non-bellwether data on February 25, 2026.

Even if these disclosures move forward, the court still must address two remaining issues, including whether EEO-1 reports for 621 entities that OFCCP concluded were not federal contractors during the relevant period were properly withheld and the allocation of attorneys’ fees and costs.

Federal contractors should anticipate that DOL will proceed with releasing withheld EEO-1 Type 2 data consistent with the FOIA judgment, likely via publication on OFCCP’s FOIA Library as has been done with regard to non-objecting contractors’ data.

UPDATE: On February 9, 2026, the district court lifted the temporary stay on the release of the EEO-1 reports by the OFCCP and ordered that by February 11, 2026, OFCCP:  

  1. “shall release the requested EEO-1 data of the five bellwether objectors”; and
  2. “provide notice…to the non-bellwether contractors of its intention to release their EEO-1 report data on February 25, 2026.”

Proskauer will continue to monitor these and other noteworthy developments impacting government contractors here.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Guy Brenner Guy Brenner

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member…

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member of the Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition Group. He has extensive experience representing employers in both single-plaintiff and class action matters, as well as in arbitration proceedings. He also regularly assists federal government contractors with the many special employment-related compliance challenges they face.

Guy represents employers in all aspects of employment and labor litigation and counseling, with an emphasis on non-compete and trade secrets issues, medical and disability leave matters, employee/independent contractor classification issues, and the investigation and litigation of whistleblower claims. He assists employers in negotiating and drafting executive agreements and employee mobility agreements, including non-competition, non-solicit and non-disclosure agreements, and also conducts and supervises internal investigations. He also regularly advises clients on pay equity matters, including privileged pay equity analyses.

Guy advises federal government contractors and subcontractors all aspects of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) regulations and requirements, including preparing affirmative action plans, responding to desk audits, and managing on-site audits.

Guy is a former clerk to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court of the District of Columbia.

Photo of Mallory Knudsen Hart Mallory Knudsen Hart

Mallory Hart is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Employment Counseling, Training, and Pay Equity groups.

Mallory attended Loyola University New Orleans College of Law, where she graduated magna cum laude and…

Mallory Hart is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Employment Counseling, Training, and Pay Equity groups.

Mallory attended Loyola University New Orleans College of Law, where she graduated magna cum laude and earned the distinction of Crowe Scholar. While in law school, Mallory served as Candidate Development and Symposium Editor for the Loyola Law Review. She competed as an oralist and later served as team coach for the National Moot Court Team. Mallory also served as Social Chair and Vice President of the Student Bar Association. During law school, Mallory also served as an extern to the Honorable Jay C. Zainey at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Upon graduation, Mallory was selected for the Order of Barristers.

During her final year of law school, Mallory worked as a Rule XX Student Practitioner in the Stuart H. Smith Law Clinic and Center for Social Justice-Children’s Rights Clinic, where she submitted an amicus brief to the Louisiana State Supreme Court.

Mallory currently serves as a junior member of the Louisiana State Law Institute.